<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="BackType Feeds" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>loupaglia's Comments Feed</title>
        <description>Feed provided by BackType.com</description>
        <link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://feeds.backtype.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-fffffdb0" type="application/json"/>
        <link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://backtype.superfeedr.com/"/>
        <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>BackType Feeds</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Should Apple be more open?</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/0008c2c99e85948246169741027c9f00</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Ron:  That is the one area where I agree. The competitive rejections are ones I question.  I can see why they do it but I don't like it, it spurns the spirit of innovation.</p><p>Chris:  Overall, I agree with you.  What core apps (when you set aside open principles) are we missing?  It is a good question.  The one thing I would say is that there is an element of &quot;you'll never know&quot; what innovation could get blocked by it being closed.  That is the danger of a closed system.</p><p>But from a business perspective.  This strategy has worked for Apple, created a unique marketplace and works for them.  Why should they change it?</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Lights in the Tunnel</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/00002569f9f00dd535547035fc429b96</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Sounds pretty far fetched that we could develop a system to overcome a 75% unemployment rate even with stratospheric government subsidy, simply because I don&quot;t see human nature of &quot;wanting more&quot; changing at the needed magnitude. </p><p>The first thought that came to me reading this post is that Ford and Ayn Rand should go bowling together. Would be quite the conversation.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The HR Acquisition</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000356f75396546169741cda2e8ed</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>It would seem this really works in two scenarios. First, where you have a good team but the business is not going to go. Second, and related, when 3.5% of the other company is going to be bigger than the total of your own.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The HR Acquisition</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000356f75396546169741140398c1</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>How does the assets and the revenues of the company you are acquiring factor in?  I would suspect the normal way but how to deal with multiples on revenues and the like become interesting particularly if you don't plan on continuing to leverage their existing line of business?</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Art of the Email Intro</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/00002854159c60a63554703513aadf6b</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Great post Raanan.  I will admit, I think have sent my share of 'intro' subject line headers. I will try to refrain from doing that in the future.The one that made me laugh is the one where you are kept on the thread after the intro is made.  How come you are never kept on the thread when there is something &quot;really&quot; compelling being discussed, like a multi-billion dollar M&#38;A deal!</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>My LinkedIn Avatar</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000359f34ef4f461697413dc25691</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.  Would be interested in hearing LinkedIn's rationale for this decision.  Also surprised that this is the type of thing they are spending time (unless of course it has become an acknowledged pervasive problem for abuse).</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Power Of Instant Approval</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000359e04bf63461697416deae231</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I do not disagree from a logistics perspective. But Apple succeeds as an experience company and let's face it, they succeeded quite well by not always listening to users. While often not the right approach, it works for them. I can't deny that being more open is quite a change from their proven methods and DNA.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Power Of Instant Approval</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000359e04bf6346169741ad51b94b</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Does Amazon have &quot;instant on&quot; for all book submissions or only from reputable suppliers?  This is the equivalent of letting anyone submit their own book to a Kindle ecosystem but in this case it is trickier because it is an app and actual code is runiing that could hose the device and device experience.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Power Of Instant Approval</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000359e04bf6346169741ccc87aab</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>But code reliability and standards adherance is only half the equation. What about the qualitative half which involves a human evaluation on the actual content of the app. Letting everything through may work in an open source world but it is very much misaligned to the corporate DNA of Apple and what many can attribute to their success.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Power Of Instant Approval</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000000359e04bf63461697413b2772d8</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I don't disagree with the existence of app store moderation process. It is a risk though for the amount of time it takes. The biggest frustration danger that I see Apple having is lack of transparency in the review and approval process.</p><p> If they could add transparency to the process by making it more clear when it was under review and more clear reasoning for rejection (ie not that is competes, I mean, confuses users with existing software). That could go a long way and would reduce the perceived time to market. Involve the community (alpha release) and they will embrace it even further.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tracked.com Gets More Social</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/0000003555252ca246169741de07f7d6</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Niyi:  you can do that by using the &quot;send message&quot; button. From there you can post to your profile, send directly to a contact or also post to a group which is neat functionality.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Add Another Zero</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d621d529f9722fa88296839e17</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Metrics are always top of mind. This is a great way to look at things to keep the metrics you track relevant and assign goals to them.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FriendFeed</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d6808deef7722fa882d160992e</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Foursquare is going to be an interesting company to watch because it is clear location data and location based connections are one of the hot frontiers.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Startup Visa Stories</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/0000256996e46ffa461697413729a0fd</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Still wonder whether it is the entrepreneur leaving to go back to their country is the biggest loss for the US or the same thing happening with people in the sciences who get their PhD's in their respective discipline and doing phenomenal research to just have to go back their countries. This happens every year as well and should very much be part of this conversation. </p><p>Both are big losses for the US and are potentially very correlated.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Startup Visa Stories</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/0000256996e46ffabecb20793729a0fd</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Still wonder whether it is the entrepreneur leaving to go back to their country is the biggest loss for the US or the same thing happening with people in the sciences who get their PhD's in their respective discipline and doing phenomenal research to just have to go back their countries. This happens every year as well and should very much be part of this conversation. </p><p>Both are big losses for the US and are potentially very correlated.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tracked.com</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/00000035e59ddc2e46169741ded6296b</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>This has huge potential.  Will they go only B2B against the likes of Hoover's, D&amp;B, DJ and other players like Yahoo! Finance and Google Finance.  There is a real compelling possibility where they could integrate the likes of Gist capability.  I'm still not a believer in &quot;enterprise&quot; tracking and &quot;personal&quot; tracking.  I want one universal dashboard that I can segment.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>@defrag wow, that's 1 picture every 10 seconds</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d65f3dc36b722fa88222049e04</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>@defrag it is okay.  that doesn't include to and fro nor does it include TV timeouts :)</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Business Model Jujutsu</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/00000035f78c167846169741ff1f5c1e</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice approach and one of those that seems &quot;obvious&quot; but is not b/c that is not often how companies think.  The typical approach is &quot;we built this API, they should thank us&quot; when the real goal is &quot;use&quot; and a lift to overall engagement, whatever that may be.  Very smart of have the developer community &quot;participate&quot; in the revenue model, it is a win-win incentive.</p><p>As David says below, it is like what Apple and FB does for apps.  I'm not sure with the business model of Twitter's API, but as revenue models gear up there, it will be interesting to see if this type of model takes hold and develops diverse set of revenue models on the communication stack.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Okay, Google's gone off the deep end.</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d6d013a477722fa882f5d6c154</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>fantastic use of the alt tag</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Trying to diagnose my father's weird-ass DSL modem config problems from 12000km away just plain ...</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d66fdd43d6722fa882da364f99</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>at a certain point, it is just easier to buy a new one.  depressing but accurate</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FriendFeed</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d68d1e7dbf722fa8821f15a745</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I must have used that paint in my last house without knowing it!</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The NY Startup Scene</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/00000035809fc348461697412d36e76d</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Max:  Matt and Toni have built a company in Automattic that is pretty remarkable that it builds such great stuff and is basically completely virtual.  The have engineers all around the world.  They have an office in SF which is normally empty except for socials and I think the last I heard their highest employee count in any one city was four.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>loupaglia</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Challenge of The Ideal First Round Term Sheet</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/0000256981c6c3da35547035a84e49b4</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Was feeling pretty confident this was going to happen until you brought universal health care up as a proxy. ;)</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>One more day, then goodbye Albany?</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d639e00072722fa882dfaf6678</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>i will miss training camp in Albany if this is the last year they have it there.  it will not be close to the same at the Meadowlands.  I enjoyed going up for a few days, hanging out at the fields, etc.  Certainly won't do that in East Rutherford.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>QB coach Chris Palmer: &quot;I'm not pleased w/ David (Carr) right noe. ...</title>
            <link>http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia/comment/000194d6a43e2a0d722fa882edf03a5d</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>not sure how you judge QBs when they have 1.5 seconds after the ball is snapped.</p><p><a href="http://www.backtype.com/loupaglia">Read more comments by Lou Paglia</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Lou Paglia</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
